John Pitts
3 min readDec 20, 2021

--

WRONG (again, sigh).

One of the 7 counts in the Kleiman case was for fraud, and the jury decided ZERO fraud was committed. How do you explain this, given you and your crowd have been claiming endlessly Dr. Craig Wright is a fraud. Since the entire case was about who is Satoshi (Craig 100% or was it Craig 50% and Dave 50%?) Nakamoto, then if CSW claims he is 100% Satoshi and is not guilty of fraud, then CSW won the case.

The $100mm was awarded for conversion, which is not in this case associated with theft (or else the Estate of Dave Kleiman would've been awarded damages). The $100mm was the jury's estimate of intellectual property which is due back to W&K Info Defense. Also, W&K Info Defense was legally collapsed, and Ira Kleiman didn't not respond to his mail to collapse it, so he's going to lose the subsequent case to determine who the partners are in W&K. The BEST Kleiman can do is:

40% Lynn Wright

35% Wright International Investments

25% Dave (Ira) Kleiman.

That's right from the original document. The 50/50 filing was after-the-fact and isn't real. Ira claimed 50% of W&K simply so he could bring the case, as anything below 50% he wouldn't have the authority. Total fraud, and we will see CSW prevail on that coming case (which begins February at the latest).

So even if Ira were to somehow pull off the revival of W&K, he would only be able to recover $25mm in IP.

He reformed W&K from the dead in Florida in order to bring the Kleiman case (THERE is your fraud) while also pulling other shenanigans like trying to frame CSW with the ATO (didn't happen, CSW won that case too), and potentially helping Craig's internal confederate doctoring emails to make it look like CSW was Satoshi and in partnership with Dave. It's quite possible Ira and his court investors (Parabellum) will end up owing damages far greater than Ira and the investors can pay. Hope Parabellum has insurance.

It's worth noting the plaintiff asked the jury for awards + damages upto $200 BILLION. After the trial, the defense asked to poll the jury (what the loser does), and left the courtroom dejected while the other side celebrated. Twice. The disputed coins number 800k plus, and are worth about $40 billion to $50 billion. The $25mm Ira could theoretically get (he'll get zero or less than zero) is at best 6/100ths of 1%, or 0.0006% of what CSW owns.

CSW: 99.9994% to 100.00%

Kleiman: 0.0006%

Yep Sam, sure looks like you're wrong as usual.

The Cobra bitcoin.org case is over, CSW won the case. Damages were ordered on Cobra by the court. Like to see how you spin that as not a win, LOL.

Lastly, the McCormack lawyer, Stuart Hoegner of Tether/Bitfinex, quit the case after CSW's evidence was approved, like 9,000 documents. That's bc disproving CSW as Satoshi is an unwinnable fight. If it were winnable, the COPA bois would've joined the McCormack case and humiliated CSW. Instead, Tether quit defending McCormack and left him for dead for months, and then when Tether came back, it was to defend the case differently, admitting that disproving CSW=SN was not winnable. So they shifted to trying to prove CSW didn't suffer any damage. LOL. The damage is the difference between fake-ass btc price, and BSV's real bitcoin price. (thanks to zero-research jerks like you). But the judge then ruled against Hoegner, saying he is not allowed to admit the evidence required to try the case that way. So with no evidence to prove no-damages, and with forfeiting the CSW != SN argument, Hoegner+McCormack is literally up shit's crick without a paddle. If you wanna think that's a win, then you should try your luck on some college football games in the 4th quarter when the loser is down 5 touchdowns. I'd wish you good luck, but no amount of luck will change the coming verdict in Wright vs McCormack libel suit.

So that's 3-0.

4-0 will come at the expense of HODLoser. Twice. Once in UK, and another time in Norway. Evidence sucks (for you) doesn't it?

Instead of fighting me and putting what's left of your reputation into the gutter, maybe you should try writing something that THANKS the inventor of the entire sector you're in.

Or keep doing what you're doing, I'm guessing Sam Williams is a throwaway anon account, so you can cut ties with your real identity when wrong for the umpteenth time.

--

--

John Pitts
John Pitts

Written by John Pitts

Recommends the BEST equities (“Diamonds”) WHEN they are (“in the Roughage”) at the lowest price to achieve the highest long term gains.

No responses yet